Update: rev2
1. Data paper Information
| Accession Number | ERDP-2017-05 |
|---|---|
| Title | Acoustic monitoring data of avian species inside and outside the evacuation zone of the Fukushima Daiichi power plant accident |
| Publication | Ecological Research 32(6): 769. doi: 10.1007/s11284-017-1491-y |
| Authors | Fukasawa, K.; Mishima, Y.; Yoshioka, A.; Kumada, N.; Totsu, K. |
| ecomoni_fukushima@nies.go.jp, k.fukasawa37@gmail.com |
2. Summary of updates
The data file has been updated.
3. Metadata update details
| Section | Ver.2 (December 20 2017)* | Ver.1 (July 2017) |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract | These data represent the presence-absence records from 52 sites monitored in 2014, 57 sites in 2015, and 54 sites in 2016. We identified the species for 7,138 segments in total and 68 species occurred in 2014, 7945 segments in total and 65 species occurred in 2015, and 5221 segments in total and 58 species occurred in 2016. | These data represent the presence-absence records from 52 sites monitored in 2014. In 2014, we identified the species for 7,138 segments in total and 68 species occurred. |
| Introduction | Here, we present a dataset obtained by avian acoustic monitoring from 2014 to 2016. | Here, we present a dataset obtained by avian acoustic monitoring in 2014. |
| Study Area | Zone 1 and 2 areas have been reviewed annually, some of the areas designation were canceled by 2016. We set up 52 monitoring sites inside and outside the evacuation zone in 2014 (33 sites outside the evacuation zone, six sites in Zone 1, seven sites in Zone 2, and six sites in Zone 3), which were the same as the insect monitoring sites used by Yoshioka et al. (2015). After that we set up 57 monitoring sites (33 sites outside the evacuation zone, eight sites in Zone 1, ten sites in Zone 2, and six sites in Zone 3) in 2015 and 55 monitoring sites (33 sites outside the evacuation zone, six sites in Zone 1, ten sites in Zone 2, and six sites in Zone 3) in 2016. | We set up 52 monitoring sites inside and outside the evacuation zone in 2014 (35 sites outside the evacuation zone, four sites in Zone 1, seven sites in Zone 2, and six sites in Zone 3), which were the same as the insect monitoring sites used by Yoshioka et al. (2015). |
| Fig. 1 | Replace new figure | |
| Sampling methods |
A digital voice recorder (DS-850, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; Fig. 2) was installed at each monitoring site during May–July in each year. Because the number of segments was very large, we chose a subset of segments evenly throughout the sampling period (8.08 days/site and 17.0 segments/day/site in 2014, 7.65 days/site and 17.8 segments/day/site in 2015, and 5.74 days/site and 16.8 segments/day/site in 2016, in average). A total of 7,138 of the 45,540 segments were chosen in 2014, 7,945 of the 46,440 segments were chosen in 2015, and 5,221 of the 42,440 segments were chosen in 2016. |
A digital voice recorder (DS-850, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; Fig. 2) was installed at each monitoring site during May–July 2014. Because the number of segments was very large, we chose a subset of segments evenly throughout the sampling period (8.08 days/site and 17.0 segments/day/site in 2014, in average). A total of 7,138 of the 45,540 segments were chosen in 2014. |
| DATA STATUS |
Latest Update: January 24, 2018. These data span the period May–June in 2014 to 2016. This census will continue after 2016 but these data have not yet been compiled. |
Latest Update: February 9, 2017. These data span the period May–June 2014. This census will continue after 2015 but these data have not yet been compiled. |
* Updates are shown in red letters
4. Data file update details
event.txt in dwca_NIES_FTEM_acousticbird.zip: Data from May 2015 to June 2016 are added.
occurrence.txt in dwca_NIES_FTEM_acousticbird.zip: Data from May 2015 to June 2016 are added.
Forgot your password?
